This is why you were getting higher improvement on GPU compared to CPU.
The CPU supports FP32 and Int8 while GPU supports FP16, FP32 (but preferred FP16). You may refer here to see which precision is compatible with which hardware.
Display quality is one of the most important specs for a photo-editing laptop if you can get the model with the superior panel, that would be useful.Choosing the right data precision in combination with specific hardware is important. One has a color gamut of 45% of NTSC like the Asus, one has 72% of NTSC and is brighter, with a higher contrast ratio. Something to check out which of the two FHD displays does your model have? I didn't contact Dell yet, but it looks like that Dell can be extended to 24Gb RAM, but ASUS only to 16GB. RAM 8GB (1x8GB) 2666MHz ddr4 + 1X free slot I wish that site would review the generation 10 UHD GPU! Still have not seen benchmarks. "HDMI 2.0 however is still only supported with an external converter chip (LSPCon)." Also my experience has been - twice! - that USB-C connectors have much lower plug-unplug longevity than specified (10K). Yes, this is definitely bleeding edge activity. Someone else may know I've never used USB-C for video output. That is a good sign! Alternate mode is how USB-C cables carry DisplayPort or HDMI protocol. I found out on Eizo site that notebook should has USB Alternate Mode, is it anything special or is it standard?
You should contact Dell and/or Asus support. What makes you think that the USB-C ports are connected to the GPU, especially if these laptops have cheapo HDMI 1.4? I don't think it's possible for anyone to answer your question without knowing the specific models. Both notebooks have USB-C (Dell has type-C 3.1/3.2 Gen 1, Asus has Type-C 3.1 Gen 1) so via USB to DisplayPort cable should I be able to output 10-bit colors (with UHD 620)?
0 kommentar(er)
